Limitless_screaming

Now he’ll be having a few bad years.

Snap sucks, but not for the reason OP stated. There’s a decillion reasons for why Snaps suck, why make up a reason that applies to other formats that are actually good?

This isn’t about truth or facts. If something major happens in Russia or related to it and the president doesn’t show up to talk about it, that would raise eyebrows. Now imagine that happening over and over again. Putin dying would be the perfect opportunity for the US to start swaying Russia into a civil war. They definitely don’t want the president’s chair to be empty and contested for.

The most useful thing to them will always be to shove anyone atop that chair before the US notices.

That’d probably be true for a while, but after that they’d need to start an “election” where some military commander or other higher up will take his chair.

It takes more work to get the 3hour job, so the job itself is easier. It takes less work to get the 12hour job, so the job is harder.

Less people can get to the “easier” job, so those people are seen as more valuable.

Not on Windows, if that’s what you’re expecting. I’ve got a panel on top, and a dock that shows running applications and the five most used apps to the right. Both auto hide.

That’s if I even realize that it’s a dream. I rarely get dreams, and when it happens I just cannot tell, no matter how wacky it gets.

The one time it happened, I just decided to walk into a mirror that wasn’t showing anything.

Under extreme circumstances too. A place you have never seen, while your running is slower than your real life walking, your punches barely do anything, and If you fall from your height, then it’s game over. Also color? what’s that?

Good luck stopping the US from attacking and sanctioning it to death then.

maybe “blaming Hamas entirely” would have been better, but I was trying to maintain the format of the comment I was replying to.

Am I? Lets put the quoted words back in their original context:

if you have to choose the lesser of two evils, then the occupation government will not be your choice, no matter what’s on the other side.

Let me break that down for you:

1. if you have to (means if you had no other choice but to do the given task)
2. choose the lesser of two evils (means that the two options are bad, and you’re about to choose the least horrible one)
3. then the occupation government will never be your choice, no matter what’s on the other side (means that the occupation government is so bad that you cannot sink lower)

BTW everyone can see what you’re giving boosts to on Kbin. It’s very weird that there are two people on the same platform (kbin), with the same position on this conflict, who have the same weird habit.

deleted by creator

Hamas made me do it. The bloodstains on the walls are just ketchup and the children getting dragged from under the rubble are just paid actors. Please get your current president to condemn Hamas and give us a shout out, thanks.

Why does what people believe about the legitimacy of the Israeli government have any effect on your acceptance of atrocities?

It doesn’t, atrocities are atrocities, but if people think that Hamas isn’t legitimate for their atrocities, then the occupation government is even less legitimate for theirs.

They’ve been choosing overcrowded areas very carefully.

Advocating for a “win at all costs” strategy is something you should accuse people supporting the murder of dozens of people because there’s a Hamas leader amongst them (still disputed) of.

I don’t want civilians to be harmed and I don’t support terrorizing people until they retaliate. those two qualities make me a better person compared to any occupation government supporter (person on the other side). lets say that I support the murder of civilians until Hamas achieves their objectives, that would only bring me down to their level, if not a little higher.

Blaming the violence of Oct 7 (which Hamas did) on Israel is not defending Hamas?

Blaming Hamas for the situation the occupation government made, which helped radicalize people and secure funding for Hamas is not defending the disgusting occupation?

He’s saying that Hamas isn’t legitimate because they committed atrocities. I will never accept this until people acknowledge that the occupation government isn’t legitimate, and doesn’t deserve a dime.

Let me be clear here: if you have to choose the lesser of two evils, then the occupation government will not be your choice, no matter what’s on the other side.

The occupation army has lost at least 15 soldiers in 24 hours, and Hamas claims that they destroyed 5 tanks, but the IDF only showed one last time I checked.

said Israel is entirely responsible for all unfolding violence.

Mostly true, not supporting Hamas.

called it innovative Palestinian resistance

It’s innovative, and starting the attack when the occupation soldiers have just moved to terrorize the West bank is pretty smart.

called the attacks exhilarating and energizing

Eh, maybe if that was said on the first day of the attack, but it got ugly quickly. They almost sank to the IDF’s level.