You’ve not been living in real life.

Then I have bad news for you.

Thanks for proving my point.

Know those annoying people that force you into accepting gay, say you’re a bigot if you don’t wanna date a trans girl and can’t take jokes? Those are woke people.

Politicals, wokeness, crime, shit on the roads, heat, shoplifting, crazy people, etc.

On Lemmy you’re automatically an extremist if you’re not socialist.

I feel quite the opposite, in fact I’ve received more downvotes on things that have nothing to be offended about while sometimes I didn’t when posting controversial things on woke subreddits.

“Billions must die.”

The objective is supposed to be to find the situations where abortion would be fair a fair trade-off of lives and rights, not to try to speedrun the abortion rank; it makes no sense you’re saying it is bare minimum when the objective is to reduce it as it is inherently bad.

I guess you don’t know much about numbers.

It is not less valuable but the way it was created was against the individual rights of the mother.

I agree abortion laws are about trade-offs as I showed in my example and that’s why abortion shouldn’t be legal in the cases I stated. Abortion shouldn’t be legal for anyone cause, if it was in a consensual relationship, the mother assumed the risk of pregnancy.

The only lives that are less valuable are those which deliberately risk or take way the others’ lives.

Also, thanks for being respectful.

???

Also, there’s no general agreement or scientific pointing of where life and consciousness is started on a fetus so, if the government job is to conserve the life of a individual, a fetus life still matters and shouldn’t be taken by neither the parents or anyone else.

Brazil (ironically enough) has a good constitution about about abortion where’s it is strictly prohibited unless some cases apply like: the baby has developed no brain, the baby has originated from a sexual assault case or the process of giving birth or the pregnancy itself represents a risk of death for the mother. It is simple, states that life’s have the same values as well as showing the individual rights matter.

We’d still be talking about the privacy part because it’d be still more concerning than the death of one random dude.

It amuses me people use anything Facebook created.

Private doesn’t means the privacy in this case just a formal formatting. If they were not discussing in a publicly available chat then it is already considered private by the definition but yeah, 99% true.

Probably WhatsApp but even if it isn’t we have to “assume” (certainly they’re doing it) that they’re are sniffing through every of your WhatsApp messages too.

Gock.