proudly displays kickstarter Bedrock Beta
EDIT: BTW, you need to check out KeeperFX if you haven’t already :) :)
proudly displays kickstarter Bedrock Beta
EDIT: BTW, you need to check out KeeperFX if you haven’t already :) :)
Fun times would be to prevent companies owning copyright.
Dungeon keeper.
Any of impression games latter worldbuilders (pharaoh, zeus, emperor)
Who the fuck is affording iphones in Russia
I wrote a whole goddamn novel-sized autorespond in Polaris that triggered on an asl. I was a 96 year old tibetan yak farmer who was allergic to wool and hated the local monks. I used to pee in their milk until one day the abbot found out and beat me with his hat.
Either that or it started screaming about asexual lizards
Well it was worse around lan 2, now it’s definitely worst
Those are for your watering system
Tell ya what, you go fight a herd of dinosaurs and see who wins
~Everyone thinks it’s funny until they face off on an emu~
Do you have many friends that rent?
Don’t try and turn this into a ridiculous class war statement on me. Am I a homeowner? Yes. I’ve literally only been a homeowner for 13 months. Before that, I rented for over 26 years. Most of my friends still rent.
And yes, there are people who choose to rent - some choose the motility, some choose to invest over mortgage and some choose to remain renters for the reasons stated in the start of this very comment thread. Don’t pretend otherwise.
You’re still acting like loan debt repayments and a rental payment are the same thing. They are not. I don’t care how many times you go to the “if you stop paying you lose your home” well, that’s the barest, most facile comparison imaginable.
In short: I don’t care how badly you want to be a pontificating chud
A bank does not legally own a house under mortgage.
Rent and loan repayments are not the same thing.
Get over it.
repaying a loan is not ‘rent-like behaviour’, applying a brush that broad would paint any regular payment as ‘rent-like behaviour’, which is preposterous.
‘Economic rent’ is a meaningless phrase, especially in this context. Rent is a concept of lease without ownership. We are literally talking about owning property. There is no rent. There is debt and burden, sure, but there is no rent.
Equity is not a lie. It’s the very simple concept of a property’s worth after deduction of amounts owing. Now the nuances and application has gotten insanely out of control in miltiple countries (I’m Australian, ask me about our multigenerational housing inequities!) But the basic idea of inflation increasing cost/value is generally sound.
A rental property and a ppr are nowhere near each other, not financially, socially or emotionally. They cannot be equated, no matter how much you torture the syntax. Each has their place for personal preference, but they are not the same
…no. I mean, you can have your feels on home ownership being a fiduciary trap, but don’t try to present them as fact.
What is incorrect are claims the bank owns the house.
The bank does not. A mortgage is a debt on the property, or if you like, a debt with the house as collateral. While this gives the bank certain rights while the mortgage is still extant (if sold they will be repaid, etc, if the debt is not paid the house is taken In recompense), they do. Not. Own. The. House. They have zero ownership. The house belongs to those on the title.
I really hate the ‘banks owns the house’ mentality, it’s not true and this weird transferral of power to ‘another landlord’ is putting the collar around your own neck and ceding power for no reason
sex is also a social construct
Can we also at least stick our head down that rabbit hole? Because holy shit yes that nebulous hybrid of social convention and biological (on a species level) necessity is also where food fits…
(I am referring of course to sex the act, not the synonym for gender…)
This is one of those gender vs sex dealies.
Food is not a social construct. But meals are.
Previously the fucking around was drivers, HAL, compatibility etc. now it’s a goddamn delousing
Convinced that napster was stealing all his moneys and pretty much cemented the idea that people pirating things means you’ve lost BILLIONS OF REVENUE as opposed to an indicator that you’ve got a supply chain or pricing problem.
I wasn’t even a metallica fan but i started downloading tracks in the days of yore just to delete them out of spite
Mate, i’m 46. I literally see this day in and day out
That’s an incredibly bad faith reading.
Anyone younger than 45 is going to have greater digital exposure and be more adept at electronic communication. The older you are, the less likely you are to be frustrated with how geriatrics communicate because the more familiar pre-digital communication styles will be to you.
Not so much a disease as an occupational hazard though…