![](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/40383ffd-08e0-4f7f-88be-1f4d61dbf2ec.jpeg)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
I’m not sure posting less is good for the fediverse in the long run, but thinking more is certainly needed! Good list
she/her
I’m not sure posting less is good for the fediverse in the long run, but thinking more is certainly needed! Good list
tbh I tbh think you’re lying, tbh
Oh Fightclub! I love that movie, I downloaded it to my Jellyfin!
What NFTs (and crypto in general) do is very different from a web of trust style approach
Crypto creates one source of absolute truth, the Blockchain, costly computed via consensus.
Web of trust, on the other hand, requires you to declare which accounts you trust. Via public-private key signing, you can always verify that a post is actually made by a specific person, and if you trust that person (e.g. because you’ve met them before and exchanged keys), you know it’s legit. You can then extend that system by also trusting accounts your trusted accounts verified, etc
It is! It says so in the trailer
At the moment it feels like the proverb about gold rushs and shovels
Annas Archive mirrors all of Zlib, libgen and more
Alternatively the Zlib darknet site is still up, afaik
That wasn’t the attempt with the Guinness world record judge present, so they didn’t accept it
It’s static, yes, but the static price is orders of magnitude higher. It still involves loading the whole model into VRAM and performing matrix multiplication on trillions of numbers
god, I hate capitalism
Bells inequality is a statement about math, it gives an inequality that could only be violated if there were no local hidden variables (read: if measurements were truly random). That was a statement of math, which is rigorously provable. It took experimental confirmation, but we can now say with high confidence that there are no local hidden variables (i.e. there is no information hidden that we simply cannot measure, instead the outcome is only decided the moment you measure).
Global hidden variables are still an option, but they would require much of the rest of physics to be rewritten
No problem! Interpretations of quantum mechanics are also still very much under discussion, and Bell’s inequality only says that there are no local hidden variables. While QM very accurately describes observations so far, it’s by no means solved, and there’s a good chance that a new theory will upend much of it in the future
He proved it mathematically, but it was only recently confirmed experimentally
it’s a matter of interpretation, but generally the consensus is that quantum measurements are truly probabilistic (random), Bell proved that there can’t be any hidden variables that influence the outcome
[email protected] HELL YEAH SIBLING OF UNKNOWN GENDER! HOGS ARE TO BE ENJOYED BY EVERYONE, AROOOO
deleted by creator
Exactly! I’m by no means against these thought experiments, I think they’re super interesting and might lead to new insights down the road. I’m just irked out by people staying these things as fact, using Elon Musk level popscience arguments.
Yeah that makes total sense, I agree