• 1 Post
  • 27 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle













  • From the original source:

    The use of white phosphorus in Gaza, one of the most densely populated areas in the world, magnifies the risk to civilians and violates the international humanitarian law prohibition on putting civilians at unnecessary risk.

    Upon contact, white phosphorus can burn people, thermally and chemically, down to the bone as it is highly soluble in fat and therefore in human flesh. White phosphorus fragments can exacerbate wounds even after treatment and can enter the bloodstream and cause multiple organ failure. Already dressed wounds can reignite when dressings are removed and the wounds are re-exposed to oxygen. Even relatively minor burns are often fatal. For survivors, extensive scarring tightens muscle tissue and creates physical disabilities. The trauma of the attack, the painful treatment that follows, and appearance-changing scars lead to psychological harm and social exclusion.

    Attacks using air-delivered incendiary weapons in civilian areas are prohibited under Protocol III of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW). While the protocol contains weaker restrictions for ground-launched incendiary weapons, all types of incendiary weapons produce horrific injuries. Protocol III applies only to weapons that are “primarily designed” to set fires or cause burns, and thus some countries believe it excludes certain multipurpose munitions with incendiary effects, notably those containing white phosphorus.

    Human Rights Watch and many states have long called for closing these loopholes in Protocol III. Palestine joined Protocol III on January 5, 2015, and Lebanon on April 5, 2017, while Israel has not ratified it.

    And for some context on exactly how fatal this might be in a place like Gaza…

    We’re talking about place where urban areas are 4x as dense as Los Angeles. Where people are not in the most steady health to begin with, given that 90-95% of the water supply is unsuitable for consumption, over 75% are food-insecure, 50% suffering malnutrition, the median age is 18, and there is no electricity or fuel to power the hospitals and ambulances – not that it matters anyway, because even humanitarian aid facilities are being targeted by air strikes.

    You could easily die from a small cut in Gaza. Anyone in the AoE here is totally fucked.



  • Yeah, this is pretty much my take.

    The web sites that are interested in this tool never wanted to be actual web sites. They wanted to be closed client-server systems with proprietary, opaque protocols… HTTP was just a convenient implementation to leverage.

    What WEI does is basically allow all of these wanna-be walled gardens to become actual walled gardens.

    They never wanted to be interoperable in the first place, so what are we losing? Good riddance.

    Maybe with this in place, we’ll be able to start rebuilding the interoperable web that we had before VC money took it over.

    We just need a compelling business model for it. “Free” ad-supported is toxic for open discourse, and now it’s functionally deprecated on the open web. I think that’s a good thing, but good changes are not necessarily easy to endure.

    I’m not sure how we’ll do it. Attention tokens and all that crypto stuff seems like garbage, but having a thousand different subscriptions to get past paywalls is not great either.


  • kibiz0r@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlWhy are folks so anti-capitalist?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalism is a tool. Being pro-capitalism is like being pro-circular saw.

    What you see as “anti-capitalism” is people pointing out that using one tool for everything is, at best, inefficient… and, at worst, dangerous.

    Insisting that everything must be quantifiable and min/maxed according to market demands is nonsense, and hurts people.

    There are things we value which are not profitable. There are things that are profitable but not valuable.



  • kibiz0r@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.mlSo let me get this straight.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wrong community, so I did have to down-doot… but I also dig your post.

    Their philosophies are pretty much a way to morally and/or pseudo-scientifically ret-con the heinous, antisocial, extractive shit they were already gonna do anyway.

    “I need the money in order to decide the path of the world, and I deserve to be the one who decides because I’m the one who managed to get the money.” There’s no room for democracy in their world view.


  • kibiz0r@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.mlSo let me get this straight.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Step forward: we hear

    That you are a good man.

    You cannot be bought, but the lightning

    Which strikes the house, also

    Cannot be bought.

    You hold to what you said.

    But what did you say?

    You are honest, you say your opinion.

    Which opinion?

    You are brave.

    Against whom?

    You are wise.

    For whom?

    You do not consider your personal advantages.

    Whose advantages do you consider then?

    You are a good friend.

    Are you also a good friend of the good people?

    Hear us then: we know.

    You are our enemy. This is why we shall

    Now put you in front of a wall. But in consideration of your merits and good qualities

    We shall put you in front of a good wall and shoot you

    With a good bullet from a good gun and bury you

    With a good shovel in the good earth.