![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0943eca5-c4c2-4d65-acc2-7e220598f99e.png)
Now thar be a question for the mushrooms.
Now thar be a question for the mushrooms.
Cum is produced for the orgasm, so the trick to a big load is to have like seven simultaneous orgasms.
You could start by setting up different porn videos for each of your eyes.
During the third or fourth time I was mad that 3D hadn’t taken off like technicolor, I though “fine! I’ll just look at trees and hallways in real life then!” And yeah, it kinda works.
There’s a lot of beauty in the world if you just, you know, look at it.
I see the word commission in a lot of your art posts. Do you draw? It’s good stuff.
I think it’s funny you talk about revenge porn like it’s just so tiresome and tedious to think about.
“Oh, a hurricane struck Florida again.”
“Oh, there’s revenge porn of my neighbor’s daughter again.”
“What a terrible saturday.”
“Anyway, I think my toast is done.”
Imaginary grenades.
Having porn made of you is imaginary?
At some point the “it’s just a game” also stops holding water…
The video game doesn’t produce anything.
AI is not the cause for generating deep fakes,
DUIs can be reduced with public transportation. What do you propose reduces… porn fakes?
Ain’t it interesting how coming up with a consistent framework, makes it applicable to different areas of life?
Fucking lol.
My problem with machine learning porn is that it’s artless generic template spam clogging up my feed of shit I actually want to see. But you know, to each their own.
My friend,
Trans women are women but they aren’t female.
Female atheletes understandably feel that it is unfair to have male atheletes breaking female atheletic records
where I said that it was unfair for trans women atheletes to play against female atheletes.
Explain to me how I am supposed to resolve these.
If you’re not anti trans athletes, then whatever, but come on.
And the ones I’ve made can be double-checked by taking a sociology class.
If I am to be charitable, I think you’re just glazing over the elephant in the room. When a little girl is told “they’re not as able,” they’re not as likely to continue. If only 13% of players are women at all, then yeah, duh, they won’t be represented in the grandmasters.
What are you even talking about, then? “The problem is sex, but it isn’t sex actually”?
If trans women can play in women’s leagues just fine (after hormonal treatment I think is the typical rule), what is “females don’t want to play with males” supposed to mean?
Is it just the hormonal treatment? You have to understand how confusing it is to phrase this point that way.
like abolishing womens sports
My man never heard of co-ed.
Is any of this true? Or is it just post-hoc, evo-psych bullshit taken from the era of scientific racism to justify the results men see after gatekeeping their very special hobby.
We could also get rid of fun, I guess.
Only clink-clang work from now on.
I’m sure this would lead to injuries, but some soccer team putting out one goliath and a bunch of rule-qualifiers does sound really funny.
that’s a central pillar of the platform so we have to agree that that’s true.
Watch out, man. The bees are starting to pollinate your mind. You should probably take another shower.
And why should those things be stopped? See, unlike you, “I believe in freedom.” If people don’t like their company town, they shall simply move away~.
I said it is better if the government doesn’t verify all the code that makes it on the internet.
You also said this apropos of nothing. I didn’t say anything about vetting code. You think I care if Biden has read your commit messages.
Oh, I understand. So, it was advertisers who fueled the 2021 capital riots.
What if that authority only disallowed bad things like murder and insider trading. Hm. Yeah, that doesn’t really feel like North Korea at all.
And what part of this requires the facebook engagement algorithm?
I’m not gonna go looking for scans or anything, but KnowYourMeme lists the popularity of this one as starting between 2013 and 2015, and I definitely remember seeing this phrase in a textbook around 2010 or 2011. So honestly, I might blame Pearson or McGraw Hill.