• ramsorge@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      137
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah they keep calling him radicalized. I just keep thinking this is a normal reaction and that corporate America and its shills are the radical ones.

      • Jamablaya@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        11 days ago

        “Would you shoot literal hitler in the back?” “Fuck yeah, bud” “Who radicalized you, everything that man did was legal”

        • ramsorge@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 days ago

          Hey, hey, let’s not bring the H man into this. It’s not like the US is rounding up immigrants into concentration camps and making them work to pay off their deportation fees so that the US can have its slave labor without being dependent on China because we are at war over Taiwan……

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’ve read the manifesto. I have the same thoughts as you. I wonder with all these people calling him radical if maybe there’s a fake manifesto out there. Something created JUST to make him sound crazy? That would explain the wildly different views of him being radical.

        Remember, one month ago, the shooting hadn’t happened yet. Nobody knew Luigis name or face. So if you go from not knowing he exists, to seeing him murder a guy, and then get told he has plans for domination, and kill all the people…it would be logical to understand why someone would call that perspective radicalized.

        That’s not what he is, or what he wrote, but if you read a fake manifesto, believed it to be real, that would explain people saying that.

        Otherwise, I’m confused where “radicalized” comes from.

        • ramsorge@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 days ago

          At first there were a lot of things floating around with people claiming to somehow have gotta access. Lot of sick fucks out there want to push an agenda.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      160
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      They didn’t ban it because it was dangerous or violent, They banned it because the anti-corporate and spez is a musk wanna be

      • spector@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Thiel is one of reddits earliest investors. spez is a Thiel boy.

        This whole time I can’t believe how reddit managed to hold up a facade of being a cool progressive college student platform. They pulled the wool over everyone’s eyes. It’s as if they put lipstick on /pol/ and /b/. And everyone was like, alright a hip liberal platform. Sure if you ignore the iceberg of right wing bootlicking shit beneath the surface of the default subreddits.

      • kora@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        11 days ago

        I mean, he claims responsibility, confirmed the existing evidence, then states his motives which aren’t hard to understand for even those out of the loop. I think the brevity and simple reasoning speak volumes louder than some maniacs scribblings found in a cabin. The fact that even those considered Semliterate would be able to grasp the bulk of his message was likely intentional.

        Its actually not shitty at all, presuming his purpose was to inspire a shift in public discourse around the topic.

        If he wanted it to be the centerpiece of a dramatic documentary miniseries, then yes, it was shitty.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        11 days ago

        I appreciate how quick a read is it. Much more likely for random people to read it and start thinking and then you can jump out of the bushes and go “surprise, you just read a manifesto!

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      There are like 50 sentences of basic reality in there, but I suspect that a lot of the moderation challenge comes from one small phrase dropped into the middle: “it had to be done.”

      With the inclusion of that, the 50 sentences of reality are recast as not just true but a valid justification for murder, even an argument that it was a duty, and that’s the rub.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Yes it is. So what. The rich glorifies violence against the poor.

    The leader of the country once said: “When the looting starts, the shooting starts”

    So if its apparantly okay to use violence against alledged thieves (which is not okay btw, stealing should never equate a death sentence), then it must be okay to use violence against mass murderer CEOs.

    “When the denying starts, the deposing starts” would be my rebuttal to that phase the ex-president said. Violence begets violence.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      You get points for honesty, at least. Most people in here don’t even admit this is a call for violence.

      • Ziglin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        It certainly doesn’t state it explicitly. It just says that the killer was the “first to face it” that way that implies that there is a possibility for more but the way I understood it was that current measures being taken aren’t enough, that doesn’t mean that other people wanting to take action should do so violently.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      So if its apparantly okay to use violence against alledged thieves (which is not okay btw, stealing should never equate a death sentence), then it must be okay to use violence against mass murderer CEOs.

      The reason violence against “looters” is permitted stems from their violation of the principles of the American caste system

      Contrary to popular belief, you are not allowed to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps. You are only allowed to help yourself when you’ve received lending permission from a state recognized philanthropic sponsor. Otherwise, you are supposed to quietly drown in your own filth, where it isn’t inconvenient for anyone higher on the totem pole than you.

      The caste system is sacred. Brian Thompson earned his position. Luigi Mangione deserved his miserable fate.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 days ago

        I like that you put “looters” in quotes. After hurricane Katrina, the news would show “looters” and “people trying to survive,” taking food items from grocery stores. I wonder what the difference was?

        the difference

        Skin hue

        Yes, people were also taking electronics, but for food?

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      most CEOs don’t murder, even the health insurance ones simply are committing theft analogs, simply not funding healthcare, not preventing those than can independently afford it from accessing it.

    • islands@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      11 days ago

      When the looting starts, the shooting starts

      That was some fascist cop in Miami in the 60’s. Not the leader of any country.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      If only Thomas Jefferson had somehow managed to cap a member of English Royalty. Instead, then Jefferson crossed the pond to suck up to Louis XVI, shortly before the man went full Ropespierre’s Necktie.

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government and provide new guards for their future security.

  • Matombo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    note that reddit didn’t have a problem with “orks must die jokes” or people celebrating war fotage as long as they celebrate the right peoples deaths

  • letsgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    11 days ago

    Of course not, it’s just Spez sucking up to the billionaires in the hope that one of them will be dumb enough to toss him a few million for his shitpile.

    • Kevnyon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 days ago

      You mean the website that didn’t ban creepshots until MSM reported on it? That website?

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        The jailbait subreddit was regularly on the front page and openly joked about for years, Spez was even a mod for a bit “as a joke” until Anderson Cooper did a story about it.

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    10 days ago

    No, it’s not.

    It’s an acknowledgement that there’s a massive problem.

    These companies are literally willing to bankrupt you to death. Their behavior is inexcusable. They profiteer off of human suffering.

    We live in a country founded by people who were unhappy with the status quo and were willing to pick up a gun to change things. We shouldn’t act surprised that it still happens. I don’t think we should celebrate it, because it’s sad that this is happening in the first place, that someone feels they need to do this. This problem is solvable, and it can be solved civilly, or it will be solved uncivilly.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      Thats exactly how I feel “Its sad that this is looking like the solution”

      Like, it had to come to this? You couldnt just set up your little racket and keep the golden goose fat and happy? Or atleast adequately provided for and left alone?

    • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      We’re are explicitly given the right to bear arms as a check to tyrannical governance.

      Our government outsourced their tyranny to corporations.

      Corporations should be well aware of strings being attached.

    • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      11 days ago

      Is anyone with a pulse still on reedit? All I ever see there are AIO/AITA/best of creative writing exercises that reek of ChatGPT

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 days ago

        Reddit was full of false outrage and fake stories long before GPT ever existed. Just the last few people that were willing to post have kind of wandered off. I think we got the best of them here

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 days ago

        On the odd occasion I go to reddit front page, AITA is always at the top with an obviously AI generated ridiculous story.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Title: AITAH for calling out my [Friend/Husband/Wife/Mom/Dad/Son/Daughter/X-In-Law] after [He/She] did [Undeniably something outrageous that anyone with an IQ above 80 should know its unacceptable to do]?

          Body of post:

          [5-15 paragraph infodumping that no sane person would read]

          I told my friend this and they said I’m an asshole. AITAH?

          Comments:

          Comment 1: NTA, you are abosolutely right, you should [Divorce/Go No-Contact/Disown/Unfriend, the person] IMMEDIATELY. Don’t walk away, RUNNN!!!

          Comment 2: NTA, call the police! That’s totally unacceptable!

          And sometimes you get someone calling out OP… 3: Wait, didn’t OP also claim to be [Totally different age and gender and race] a few months ago? Heres the post: [Link]


          🙄 C’mon, who even think any of this is real…

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’m there for a couple of videogames and the homelab/selfhosted stuff. Curated subreddits are still active and real.

      • pycorax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        Some communities just don’t really have an equivalent elsewhere but I’m purely only lurking now. Don’t comment anymore, use a modded third party client on mobile and ublock origin on desktop.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    See, then you are giving a murderer’s message publicity. As opposed to UnitedHealthcare, responsible for far more many deaths, having the ability to have as much publicity and as many lobbyists as they want.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Alleged murderer.

      I think he is more than just the (relatively trivial) allegations against him. He has rallied support for massively reforming the American Healthcare system, which will save countless lives, improve our quality of life, and ensure the financial stability of the American Public.

      • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        He has rallied support for massively reforming the American Healthcare system…

        I would disagree with this. Nobody is talking about health care reform. People are talking about destroying an economic system that creates billionaires, and also about destroying the billionaires themselves. This hasn’t been a call for reform, it’s a call to arms.

        The scariest thing is that people are beginning to accept that the system has always been rigged, and there is no other way to fix it.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 days ago

        Robert Kennedy also did quite a bit of rallying on that front. Kennedy’s why I voted for Trump.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I’ve definently noticed how more and more things are being disallowed to talk about on social media. It’s just a matter of which platforms has which rules, but the rules are also changing as more and more people are complaining about reading things they don’t agree with.

    I suspect we will just discuss memes in the future, and politics, since politics is something that the leaders want us to care about and fight eachother over.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      That’s because America is the land of the free to shut up and do what you’re told, or else.

      • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Interesting. Might be cool if Lemmy allowed mods to apply a NSFW tag that only a mod our admin could remove.

      • spector@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I had the realization about this distinction several years ago regarding reddit. Over the years of attrition by various controversies, reddit no longer has moderators. They’ve all left. There are moderators in name but they do not moderate.

        Many set the mod bots to do bot things and then fuck right off. To be fair moderating global scale messageboard is kind of an impossible task. Much less to do it for free. Can’t fault the the old school internet moderators for leaving.

        On another note. There’s no way to tiptoe around the issue of intelligence. The baseline level of discourse just isn’t capable of hard topics as it used to be. People seem to like the social drama that arises out of lack of moderation. That biases towards the lowest common denominators. It’s like a modern day Jerry Springer shock jock entertainment. But live and interactive! Social media users seem to revel in it. Bread and circuses…

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 days ago

      We used to make fun of Chinese social media censorship. Soon sharing images of Nintendo’s Luigi will be as censored as sharing images of Winnie the Pooh in China.